Struan and Group:

Here is Struan�s version of what Pirsig says: (from ltr dtd 18 Jan.)

�. . . Pirsig . . . tells us that every ethical dilemma can be placed 
into his framework to give us an absolutely scientific answer, 
which is binding upon all men for all times.�

Here is what Pirsig actually says: (from Chap. 13, Lila)

�In general, given a choice of two courses to follow and all 
other things being equal, that choice which is more Dynamic, that 
is, at a higher level of evolution, is more moral. An example of this 
is the statement that, "It's more moral for a doctor to kill a germ 
than to allow the germ to kill his patient." The germ wants to live. 
The patient wants to live. But the patient has moral precedence 
because he's at a higher level of evolution.
�Taken by itself that seems obvious enough. But what's not so 
obvious is that, given a value-centered Metaphysics of Quality, it is 
absolutely, scientifically moral for a doctor to prefer the patient. 
This is not just an arbitrary social convention that should apply to 
some doctors but not to all doctors, or to some cultures but not all 
cultures. It's true for all people at all times, now and forever, a 
moral pattern of reality as real as H20. We're at last dealing with 
morals on the basis of reason. We can now deduce codes based 
on evolution that analyze moral arguments with greater precision 
than before. In the moral evolutionary conflict between the germ 
and the patient, the evolutionary spread is enormous and as a 
result the morality of the situation is obvious. But when the static 
patterns in conflict are closer the moral force of the situation 
becomes less obvious.�

By taking Pirsig�s words out of context and omitting several key 
phrases, Struan gives a false account of Pirsig�s position. The 
�absolute, scientific� to �every ethical dilemma� that Struan claims 
Pirsig asserts actually applies only to the doctor-germ case as 
shown in the phrase, � . . . it is absolutely, scientifically moral FOR 
A DOCTOR TO PREFER THE PATIENT.� Similarly, the context 
clearly shows that the phrase �binding on all men for all times� 
also applies to the doctor-germ example. Furthermore, Pirsig 
qualifies Struan�s absolutist interpretation in several places, first 
by beginning the section with �In general, given a choice of two 
course to follow and all other things being equal . . .� and by 
ending with . . . �the moral force becomes less obvious,� thereby 
indicating that to apply the MOQ structure to every ethical situation 
is no easy, cut and dried task.

In the paragraphs that follow (vegetarians, civil war, death penalty) 
Pirsig illustrates the use of the MOQ structure to make rational 
ethical decisions compared to relying on irrational social 
convention which can only lead to the absurdities of moral 
relativism where determining right or wrong depends on the 
beliefs of the group you belong to (political correctness being the 
prime example.) I�ll choose Pirsig�s method over PC any day.

Platt



MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Reply via email to