Hi there
On 20 Jan 2001, at 11:14, Struan wrote:
> I also note to my satisfaction that not one person here is prepared to make
> even the most cursory attempt to support the specific ethical examples in
> Lila. Could it be that I have a point and that this is what has sparked yet
> another tedious round of attacks upon my person from those without the
> faculties to do better?
But Struan, if you were able to read and retain information for more than a few
seconds you
would realise why no-one can be bothered to answer the strawman accusations that you
make.
Starting from a Quality position the examples that you refer to make perfectly good
sense!
Why bother to argue with someone about the bleedin' obvious when you know that the
response will be either a thinly disguised torrent of abuse and/or an attempt to
instigate a
wind-up. It has nothing to do with a problem with the MoQ but more to do with most
peoples
wish to have as little to do with YOU as possible. As Riff-Raff suggested in an
earlier post
this is known as BOYCOTT and is being practiced by most. As I said in my last post
your
main purpose is to disrupt dialogue not to engage in it - this becomes more obvious as
you
continue to post and the majority on this forum understand that. You claim to be
attempting to
refute Pirsig whilst continually misrepresenting what he says - this is also becoming
more
obvious. Keep it coming Strewann.
Oh by the way I was most gratified to see that you continued to fail to point to any
evidence
whatsoever of the effect you claim to have on me, nor will you ever because you're
really not
good enough to provoke me sufficiently. Thanks Ol' chap, this is the most fun I've had
for a
while - toodle pip!!!!
Horse
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
