Hi there
On 24 Jan 2001, at 10:48, rtp phil wrote:
> I didn't mean 'Q' is purely biological, and we can't apply it to society and
>intellect.
OK
> I think the origin and concept of Q is biological in nature.
The concept of Q is created by intellectual patterns of value whilst the origin of Q
is
fundamental and primary and creates all the static patterns from Inorganic through
Biology,
Social and Intellectual.
> RMP says Q is like a railway track, always going ahead, if for the better.
> Improving the Q of society, improving the intellect, help us (the concerned
>biological unit)
> to survive in time.
But what about the Inorganic level? You seem to be assuming that Quality is
non-existent in
Inorganic/Quantum reality. Quality is prior to the Inorganic/Quantum level (it has to
be - it is
primary) but as with all the other levels, the Inorganic/Quantum level exists in
Static/Dynamic
equilibrium. You are quite correct about the rest but don't forget or underestimate
the parent
of Biology.
> Q of non biological things matter only when one BU get connectad with it.
I think that Biology (BU = Biological Unit?) arises (is emergent) from the
Inorganic/Quantum
level and as with any emergent property it is seperate from, but related to it's
parent.
Horse
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
