Hi Rick:

Thanks for responding to the Pirsigian test.

PIRSIG (from RICK):
"...conventional reason bears it out.  The material object of observation 
can't be right or wrong.  Molecules are molecules.  The don't have any 
ethical codes to follow except those people give them." (ZAMM chap. 
14, 146).

RICK:
I think Pirsig was closer to the truth in ZAMM when he wrote the quote 
above. He has neglected his own advice and assigned ethical codes 
to molecules (and eveything else in the universe) via the MoQ.  
Accepting the above means rejecting at least the Inorganic level of the 
MoQ and at most the entire Quality=Morality equation (and thus the 
whole MoQ).  Bodvar (and possibly even Pirsig himself) have 
dismissed much of ZAMM's philosophy as "abortive" or 
"experimental"... despite this, I still think Pirsig got it right the first time.  
After all... "...beginners are usually quicker than experts..." (LILA chap. 
9,138).

Good thing he qualified that last statement by �usually.� In his 
continuing search for truth, Pirsig ultimately rejected the classic-
romantic division of ZAMM for the static-Dynamic Quality split of LILA, 
allowing him to reveal a much deeper reality.

PIRSIG:
�Since this whole metaphysics had started with an attempt to explain 
Indian mysticism Phaedrus finally abandoned this classic-romantic 
split as a choice for a primary division of the Metaphysics of Quality. 
The division he finally settled on was one he didn't really choose in any 
deliberative way. It was more as if it chose him.� (LILA Chap 9.)

As to whether molecules experience anything or behave according to 
an ethic, I refer you to Alfred North Whitehead (who Pirsig mentions as 
a mentor) because in his philosophy each actual entity is capable of 
prehensions that involve feelings, emotions, consciousness, and so 
on. This is called panpsychism, a subject you�ll find many references 
to on the Web if interested. 

PIRSIG
�The question of whether an electron does a certain thing because it 
has to or because it wants to is completely irrelevant to the data of what 
the electron does. So what Phaedrus was saying was that not just life, 
but everything, is an ethical activity.� (LILA Chap 12.)

Platt



MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Reply via email to