Hi 3wd:
You wrote:
Would suggest you read (or re-read) Wilbur's chapter "The Great 
PostModern Revolution" in a "Brief History of Everything" for the single, 
yet most profound, insight that both Pirsig and the Post Modernists 
have in common. In fact I'll wager that history will judge Pirsig's two 
"novels" as some of the greatest postmodernist literature ever. I'm 
equally sure that even though Platt, for instance, may not like or buy this 
interpretation he'll not see fit to call me or Pirsig an ignorant liar or 
plagarist because he does not agree with, or understand, this PoV.

Excuse me. When did I call anyone a liar or plagiarist? Didn’t you mean 
to say Kevin instead of Platt? Furthermore, lest anyone get the idea that 
Wilber and I don’t agree, check out the following verbatim text from “A 
Brief History of Everything” in which Wilber makes no bones about his 
problem with extreme postmodernists who comprise, as I’ve said, a 
“major movement in American Universities.” 
>From Chapter 4, “A Brief History of Everything” by Ken Wilber, 
Shambhala Publications, 1996 (CAPS ADDED in several places for 
emphasis.):
“Faced with the discovery of ‘not pregiven,’ a theorist can then take one 
of two routes through this new and confusing postmodern landscape 
where nothing is foundational.
“The first, and PROBABLY MOST COMMON. is to go the route of 
extreme constructivism—which is the strong version of ‘not pregiven.’ 
That is, because worldviews are not pregiven, you can claim that they 
are all arbitrary. They are simply ‘constructed’ by cultures based on 
nothing much more substantial than shifting tastes.
“So we have all these books with titles like the social construction of 
sex, the social construction of food, the social construction of labor, the 
social construction of clothing, and so on. I keep expecting to see 
something like the social construction of the large intestine.
“Everything is ‘socially constructed’—this is the mantra of the extremist 
wing of postmodernism. They think that different cultural worldviews 
are entirely arbitrary, anchored in nothing but power or prejudice or 
some ‘ism’ or another—sexism, racism, speciesism, phallocentrism, 
capitalism, logocentrism, or my favorite, phallologocentrism. Wow. 
Does that puppy come with batteries or what? 
(portion omitted)
“Question: Isn’t Foucault often associated with this extreme 
constructivism.
“Ken W: Yes, he started down this road, only to find that it is a dead end.
“Question: In what way?
“Ken W: If the constructivist stance is taken too far, it defeats itself. It 
says all worldviews are arbitrary, all truth is relative and merely culture-
bound, THERE ARE NO UNIVERSAL TRUTHS. But that stance itself 
claims to be universally true. It is claiming everybody’s truth is relative 
except mine, because mine is absolutely and universally true. I alone 
have the universal truth and all you poor schmucks are relative and 
culture-bound.
“This is the massive contradiction hidden in all extreme multicultural 
postmodern movements. And their absolute truth ends up being very 
ideological, very power-hungry, very elitist in the worst sense. 
“This extreme constructivism is really just a postmodern form of 
nihilism; there is no truth in the Kosmos, only those notions that men 
force on others. This nihilism looks into the face of the Kosmos and 
sees and unending hall of mirrors, which finally show it nothing but its 
own egoic narcissism: Truth is ignored and replaced with the ego of 
the theorist. THIS IS A MAJOR MOVEMENT IN AMERICAN 
UNIVESITIES. (End of quote)
That we are evolving to higher, more encompassing, more 
transcendental worldviews as Wilber predicts and Pirsig implies I have 
no doubt. If that be postmodernism, fine. Under that definition, Pirsig’s 
books are indeed postmodernist literature as you claim. I also believe 
as you do that history will judge his writings to be great. But the 
postmodernism that is a “major movement” as described above is the 
one I find absurd and potentially dangerous because it morally 
disarms those who don’t see the idiocy that Wilber and others rightfully 
expose.
Platt



MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Reply via email to