|
Dear Matt,
Thanks for fleshing yourself out (13/6
18:29 -0500).
Your dislike of discussing the philosophy of
religion does not convince me though. What about sharing (religious/DQ)
experience (instead of "discussing" in the sense of exchanging
opinions) as I suggested?
Do you agree with my (9/6 23:54 +0200) definition
of religion as the essentially human pursuit of re-experiencing DQ?
You identify yourself as an atheist,
someone who thinks God doesn't exist. Why not as a agnostic, who does not
believe in God?
Which God does not exist for you?
Whatever you write, I will probably agree with you.
What does "believing in God"
mean for you? I will probable agree that I don't do that either.
Do you think DQ exists? Would you
"believe" in it, if "believing" were to mean just
"trusting"? It would amount to something like trusting that static
patterns migrate towards Dynamic Quality...
With friendly greetings,
Wim
Nusselder |
- Re: MD God and the MoQ Wim Nusselder
- Re: MD God and the MoQ Matt the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat
- Re: MD God and the MoQ Marco
- MD Our special glasses Platt Holden
- Re: MD Our special gl... Simon Knight
- MD Animal Rights ... Platt Holden
- RE: MD Our special gl... Marty Jorgensen
- Re: MD God and the MoQ HisSheedness
- Re: MD God and the MoQ HisSheedness
- Re: MD God and the MoQ Marco
