[x] [snipped quotes] MOQ is not a "philosophy" it is more a subjective method of apprehending clarity Natives are a more socially subjective culture Quality is subjective Time and space are relative to the observer Quality works better as a subjective noun.
Back off and look at the book as a whole, subjectively. As the Eagle would. And the patterns of value emerge. The story "Lila" is the connection. [Case] I think a subjective method that styles itself as a metaphysics really is trying to be a philosophy. But for a philosophy that attempts to resolve S/O duality it is a bit subject heavy. Since it seems aimed at correcting the slighting of values this is not necessarily bad. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
