[Bo]
> What is all this about American Indians' culture
being non-S/O
>supposed to prove?
What is good? As in dog good/good dog.
[Bo]
> We know that the social level along with all levels
below intellect are > non-S/O. If it is to indicate
that they had reached a Quality-like
>meta-level it's wrong, they were no different than
any other >"aboriginals" in this respect.
Never did get back to the excellence/arete did
ya? You mentioned you would many posts ago. Can you
talk about dynamic quality? How about static quality?
Or are you a trojan horse dressed in quality full of
SOM? What does divide mean to you? Beautiful, is
that S or O or the divide since it seems your
intellect is only full of an S, O, or divide?
These are all sincere questions.
snow falling all day, woods are beautiful
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
