[Kevin]
> Lately (maybe longer than I care to admit) my
curiosity has been
> focused on dualism. Dualism, or rather its
resolution, is clearly, to
> me anyway, the impetus for the MOQ.
Do you think the MoQ says there is dualism?
Isn't this tautology, a repeating of what was
understood before MoQ? For example, some say Darwin
came up with evolution, Darwin did no such thing,
evolution was a concept before Darwin was even born.
Darwin came up with natural selection, not evolution.
[Kevin]
> And it seems to me that dualism is at the root of
most if not all of
> the big questions. ...each a pair of polar
opposites or is there a
> oneness to be found?
Please explain how mind is opposite of matter?
Or even how you know for certain that a subject is not
an object?
[Kevin]
> And if oneness is not an illusion then how is it
realized?
What is this oneness your talking about?
I wouldn't mind a dialogue here, thanks.
deer just ran by,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
