>From: "Case" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >To: <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [MD] Global Warming: Science or Politics? >Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:24:59 -0500 > >[Platt] > > > > As a thoughtful processor of information I'm sure you are aware that >data can be slanted to support a point of view. > > > > [Dan] > > The Bush administration has consistently slanted the global warming >debate > > > ever since taking office. Check this out: > > > > http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/31/1543215 > >[Platt] >Thanks for making my point. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the >gander.
[Dan] The MOQ clearly states that it's immoral for social level patterns to usurp intellectual level patterns. Either I've missing the point entirely or you're grasping at straws. > >[Case] >So maybe all these scientists being muzzled by the Bush administration >should swap jobs with the legions of contrarians Platt claims are cringing >in fear of the liberal academic power elite. [Dan] Looks like you're being rather casual. Gotta watch out for that. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
