[Platt] I miss your point entirely. Whoever interprets raw data can slant it to support an argument. When a political body (social level) like the UN uses data to claim global warming, it does what the MOQ says is immoral. See "How to Lie with Statics" referred to at:
[Case] While lying with statistics may work for politicians it is less effective in the sciences where most of the practitioners are familiar with Huff and Mark Twain. That is what peer review is designed to eliminate. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
