Marsha, Ron, SA, (and David H, and Mark, and Gav ...)

I made (sincere) suggestions before for creating some more slightly
more formal environment in which MoQ could be nurtured to wider public
value. (Always in addition to the truly wonderful / dynamic nature of
MoQ.Discuss, without any suggestion of cramping anyone else's style or
initiative.)

My (sincere) motives were severely questioned when I suggested the
idea that any such a new initiative needed

(a) some "organisation and management" (even the merest organisation), and

(b) that management must NOT be vested in any self-selecting
individuals (and that includes me), but constituted in some
appropriate form of governance on "our" behalf - without that we are
prone to indivual political interests and agendas (mine included)

Dave Harding pushed the MoQ Wiki idea, after Marsha and Gav and others
suggested more "public" material, but also got significant push-back;
though it's still live and linked from MoQ.Org.

I still stand by my "Friends of Quality" idea, and Sam's "Magazine of
Quality" spin-off idea. A few weeks ago joined up those dots and put
that proposal on the MoQ Wiki.

Since I've not received tirades of abuse for my efforts, I can only
assume my ideas have been accepted; either that or no-one has looked
at the wiki recently ;-)

Sincerely
Ian

On 2/15/07, Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  Lila
> > >(Ch. 5):
> > >
> > >      "Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable in the
> > >sense that there is a knower and
> > a known, but a metaphysics can be none of these things.  A metaphysics
>
> > must be divisible, definable
> and
> > >knowable, or there isn't any metaphysics. Since a metaphysics is
> > >essentially a kind of dialectical definition and since Quality is
> > >essentially outside definition, this means that a 'Metaphysics of
> > Quality' is essentially a contradiction in terms, a
> logical
> > >absurdity."
>
> [X]
> RIGHT ON THE MONEY SA, exactly what I was aiming at..."new age",
> harrupmff!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heather Perella
> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [MD] the MOQ and its environment
>
>
>
>     [SA quoted previously]
> > >      Many are very familiar with this quote in
> > Lila
> > >(Ch. 5):
> > >
> > >      "Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable in the
> > >sense that there is a knower and
> > a known, but a metaphysics can be none of these things.  A metaphysics
>
> > must be divisible, definable
> and
> > >knowable, or there isn't any metaphysics. Since a metaphysics is
> > >essentially a kind of dialectical definition and since Quality is
> > >essentially outside definition, this means that a 'Metaphysics of
> > Quality' is essentially a contradiction in terms, a
> logical
> > >absurdity."
>
>     [Marsha]
> > Don't you think that is perfect?
>
>     Yes.
>
>     [SA previously]
> > >      Isn't static quality, though, the Metaphysics
> > of the MoQ, and dynamic quality is the Quality of
> the
> > >MoQ?
>
>     [Marsha]
> > Unless you would like me to respond with a quote from 'Alice in
> > Wonderland', I think I'll just be
> quiet.
>
>
>    Isn't what I said above surmised from the quote given from Lila?
>
> SA
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Need Mail bonding?
> Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to