One would imagine that attempting to build a model of the mind would yield A greater Understanding of our own, but they allways seem to want to exterminate The human race after a bit...I hate when that happens.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Case Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 7:57 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] Quantum computing [Ham] I couldn't distinguish a qubit from a quantum, not that I care. One is as "uncertain" as the other. There will always be uncertainty in life -- it's a built-in factor of man's freedom. The goal of philosophy has always been to achieve wisdom, not certainty. But so long as philosophers hang on the coat-tails of scientific materialists, they will never come up with an epistemology that relates proprietary awareness to the experienced world. And this, it seems to me, is where contemporary philosophy should be heading. [Case] How that word "uncertainty" must haunt your dreams; a single word unhinging the doors to your perception; a dust devil turning your house of cards into pasteboard rubble. As long as philosophers claim they can ignore scientific materialism they will continue their long slide into irrelevance. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
