[Case] I guess the difference would be whether you want to know was is "really" going on or whether you just want a sense of personal satisfaction. By the time science "eventually" figures something out it is too hard for us regular folks to figure out anyway. I tend to rely heavily on my own subject understandings regardless of what mode of thinking I employ so it's pretty much a wash from that standpoint. Since discoveries in modern science paint a truly bizarre and fascinating world view, I tend to regard religio-mystic-philosophical thinking as just lazy. You know kinda logical but with no math and no actual facts to get in the way. [x] seems it's about how close you hang to the frontier of rational thought, I'm with you, I'd rather strike a match than curse the darkness, I just hesitate at totally dismissing possibities on the grounds that they Do not fit in with the percieved convention of the time. What "really is goin on" stops dead in the middle of The four lane highway of science scratchin it's head, it's at this point in the road where this problem Of o.k., do we wait, accept where we're at or project, (no matter how ludicris). I think laziness was 2 or three exits back, I would like to give Platt and Ham at least that much credit.
Tight leather might increase blood pressure in the brain like a g-suit allowing for increased accuracy Plus all the baddies are distracted, with this in mind, maybe the swedish bikini team would be better at mopping Up the insurgencey, sure be nicer to watch on CNN. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Case Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 12:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] Quantum computing [x] When you get to a scientific point of objective reality as fluctuating patterns of energy, it certainly leaves a wee bit of room for stuff like that, you really can't rule it out absolutely. You can "believe" science wil "eventually" Figure this out too or go "mystic" or "religous" everything goes to a subjective interpretation from there. That's why I kinda abandoned scientific method for now and I am focusing on interpretation and meaning to arrive at accuracy. [Case] I guess the difference would be whether you want to know was is "really" going on or whether you just want a sense of personal satisfaction. By the time science "eventually" figures something out it is too hard for us regular folks to figure out anyway. I tend to rely heavily on my own subject understandings regardless of what mode of thinking I employ so it's pretty much a wash from that standpoint. Since discoveries in modern science paint a truly bizarre and fascinating world view, I tend to regard religio-mystic-philosophical thinking as just lazy. You know kinda logical but with no math and no actual facts to get in the way. [x] Silver is up these days, be one expensive hobby to hunt werewolves now, a holy water supersoaker would Be a cheap way to kick some ass though. [Case] Or you could make bullets with silver nitrate or phosphorescent goo inside depending on your target. Tight black leather seems to improve the aim. But for common household poltergeist and domestic demon infestation the supersoaker is the way to go. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
