Hi Marsha, I didn't see the context of that remark, but I like awkward questions :-)
You asked >Are you wanting to put into the MOQ the sages/buddhas level? I (and others) have made that kind of suggestion before, an enlightened level at the top of or above the "traditional" intellectual level. Yes, it may be a static pattern to name it and place it there, but there is nothing says the MoQ can't support that evolving to even higher levels of enlightenment (where we'll have to find new words to describe what we're talking about.) Ian On 2/16/07, MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 03:11 PM 2/16/2007, I wrote: > >Marsha: > >Are you wanting to put into the MOQ the sages/buddhas level? Those > >who have fully realized the view from above all levels? > > I admit this was very awkward question, since buddhas and sages would > be a collection of static patterns of value. Please disregard it. > > m > moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
