At 05:00 PM 2/16/2007, you wrote: >Hi Marsha, I didn't see the context of that remark, but I like awkward >questions :-) > >You asked > >Are you wanting to put into the MOQ the sages/buddhas level? > >I (and others) have made that kind of suggestion before, an >enlightened level at the top of or above the "traditional" >intellectual level. Yes, it may be a static pattern to name it and >place it there, but there is nothing says the MoQ can't support that >evolving to even higher levels of enlightenment (where we'll have to >find new words to describe what we're talking about.) > >Ian
Ian, Interesting. But still a Buddha or Sage is still a person, and a person would be comprised of spovs from the inorganic, biological, social and intellectual levels. But thanks for the encouragement. m moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
