Quoting Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Platt] > Has this study been submitted for peer review or been duplicated > experimentally? > Is this an example of using as a factual source any old blog? :-) > > > [Case] > Further evidence that you wouldn't know it if it bit you on the butt. This > is a news article from a credible source (MSNBC) reporting on a study that > was presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Personality and > Social Psychology by researchers from Emory University. > > This level of discernment speaks volumes about the positions you hold and > how you arrive at them.
MSNBC a credible source? Ha, ha, ha, ha. As for rest, the questions remain. I learned them from you. Your citing the study as if that were the holy writ speaks volumes about the positions you hold when convenient. When not convenient, you ignore your own "scientific" criteria. ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
