[Platt]
> When not convenient, you ignore your own
"scientific" criteria.
Ah, but Platt, you have no criteria and that's
the point. I've gone step by step with you before on
this. First, what is your source. Second, compare
numerous sources. Third is when I asked you, how did
you come to your conclusions? Did you come up with
this on your own doing field work? From the Ivory
Tower of just all in your head deduction? Did
somebody else persuade you? Or do you just like to
provide opposition behavior? I just want to know your
baseline reason as to why you dismiss what researchers
have concluded. It is not that I might agree or
disagree with these researchers. I can't count them
out just because I want to. There must be some
criteria you use to argue against this study. Even if
your criteria is well the bible tells me so. If
that's your reason, I don't know if I could really
argue against your reasoning. Not because I believe
the Bible literally, but due to how do I displace
somebodies beliefs, somebodies elses truth, as Pirsig
points out there are many truths trying to define the
'source of all', in other words, dynamic quality.
Pirsig points out that traditional philosophy argued
points against opposition until the opposition was
shown to be illogical, but the MoQ is an illogical
absurdity. So, how does one argue against an
illogical absurdity?
So, is your criteria found on one of the static
levels, in which laws are present? Or are you just
trying to talk about dynamic quality and dismissing
any static quality, including the scientific
approaches that have intellectual methods, criteria,
and therefore some form of intellectual laws?
thanks.
snowing, again,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
