Hello Bo, > I'm puzzled why oneness means so much Intuition was a spike in my MBTI results (INFP). And I'm no stranger to empathy. But even after 36 years of marriage to the same woman I have never mastered the ability to read people's minds. > - "dualism" seems a swear-word In discussions about ultimate reality dualism is code for inconsistency and incompleteness. And you're right. Why would anyone have a problem with saying this or that philosophy is dualistic. Within the context of ultimate reality aren't all philosophies dualistic? > - and [I'm puzzled] why so few appreciate the significance of the > Dynamic/Static split compared to the S/O one. (Kevin may be the > exception) Thank you...I think. > The enormous explanatory power of the MOQ rests with the static levels. Frankly, I'm puzzled why people see any power at all in the MOQ's static levels. To see how this power might affect the world at large look no further than the community at moq.org. Make no judgment. Just simply observe. How has the MoQ's static levels affected life in this community? How has quality improved here in the past several years? More or less diversity? More or less creativity? More or less freedom? More or less respect? More or less petty arguments?
Kevin --------------------------------- Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
