Hi Bo
> To see their reality as "absolute" is what the human beings have > done - always. The social level age regarded their respective > mythological world-views as absolute, no one regarded it as > myths or provisional, but then there were no skeptics around, > because such are part of intellect. So is the term "truth" > contrasted to "mere opinion" which was the first variety of SOM. > Later it developed into objectivity contrasted to subjectivity > (mind/matter) as we know it as. DM: SOM claims we can extract values from experience to establish objective truths. This is bogus as MOQ points out. This fantasy was a simplification that helped us progress our knowledge for awhile, but MOQ shows it is bogus and that we need to be able to understand how knowledge is grounded in experience. You seem to think otherwise. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
