Hello Ian, > A lot of people come to that view and still hold it after much reflection. > > Who was it said, that "in order to demonstrate the possible one > sometimes has to do the impossible" ? > > I look at it this way. > In order to demonstrate that ZMM was "it" Pirsig had to write Lila. I agree completely. And this is why I see the MoQ as a conception. > To use the language of the other mail > Lila is the whole, ZMM is the part which contains the whole. > > Depending where (part) you break into this loop / Quine, you get a > different perspective, but it's the same (whole) loop you're in. > Clearly to appreciate that, you have to appreciate both ZMM and Lila. Thanks Ian. Really. Thanks for sharing your point of view.
Kevin --------------------------------- It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
