Ham, Bells are beginning to ring Fancy this: Lets negate Micahs statement "Objective reality can not be proven to exist out side human awareness." with Human awareness can not be proven to exist outside of objective reality.
Curious, what value would you arrive at? -Ron -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ham Priday Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MD] The illusion that is subject [Quoting Ron]: > Does "one-ness" mean the absence of opposites, for if there were no > opposites there would be no change no value no-thing does "one-ness" > mean no-thing-ness? > > is it that the subject is an illusion? YES!! You have just stated Cusa's theory of non-contrariety. Congratulations, Ham moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
