At 02:54 AM 3/14/2007, Magnus wrote:
>This problem with the social level and size that you and Pirsig >seems to think >is sooo hard to overcome, is *not* a problem! You just have to learn how to >distinguish social, inorganic and biological value at those scales. > >1. The first thing you need to think about is the dimensional view of the >levels, a *thing* can be manifestation of many different types of >patterns, not >just one as you seem to think. > >2. You must use a have better definitions of the levels, and those >definitions >*must not* be based on examples of *things*, because that will just make it >impossible to do 1 above. > >If you follow these two steps, the problem goes away. Give me some hard nuts >that seem fuzzy to you and I'll show how to do it. This is very interesting. >BTW, if someone else understands what I mean, feel free to rephrase >it in other >terms so that maybe more can understand. I seem to lack the finer >nuances of the >English language to make myself understood. Greetings Magnus, Please point me to your most thorough explanation. I would like to read more. Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
