[Platt]
An encouraging report, but nevertheless rather narrow in scope, measuring just
4th and 8th graders in reading and math. From a broader perspective, private
schools offer a number of educational advantages, described on the Private
School Review website.

[Arlo]
The bottom line is that success in school may have less to do with attending a
"private" or "public" school, but may have very much to do with "educational
attitudes and philosophies" in the home.

That is, pound for pound, when you align key factors (as mentioned in the NYT
article) performance was equal, with a slight advantage going to public
schools. In some ways, its a little like the "UPS v. USPS" argument you and
Case had a while back. It certainly "seems" like UPS is more efficient, but
they don't have to deal with the millions and millions of letters the USPS
does, at the cost USPS charges.

But I see this all the time here. The State College Area schools are among the
top in the state, with surrounding districts fairing much worse. Why? Simple.
The children who attend the State College Area Schools come from the homes of
those mostly in the employ of the academy, or in study in the academy, and
hence there is a strong valuation for education in the home.

The most important thing parents can do, if they feel their child is not getting
a good education, is simply "get involved". Run for school board, attend PTA
meetings, volunteer in the classroom, and most importantly, spend an hour or so
each night going over homework, talking about current events, philosophy (I had
my 14 year old daughter write me an short essay on "Aesthetics" in order to
earn a few hours on the Internet last weekend. Afterward, I read to hear some
passages from ZMM. Someday, I hope, she'll join us on the list) and other
topics related to educational growth. When its valued in the home, it will
occur in the schools. Study after study after study has shown that.

[Platt]
Of particular interest to both Arlo and me is art eduction. In this respect:

[Arlo]
Well, yes. And I'll tell you that I am an advocate of Charter and alternative
schools, for two primary reasons. First, to target specialty curriculae towards
particular student populations. Second, to target similar groups of students
with particular learning styles. I am also an advocate of broad change in the
public schools, from integrated curriculae, to emphasizing and integrating
"art" (as Platt mentions).



moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to