[Jos]
As Ron describes, that process will then become iterative and you end up
with fractals branching endlessley divergent from an infinite source.
The "whole new logic" is the framework of topos that allows multiple
sets of apparently conflicting logic types to exist and be applied to
the same problem, in its-self this has no basis for decision making but
is an intellectual(?) tool for setting out a wider playing field into
which other theories can be slotted together in a (new) rational way. As
the NS review has it, a basis for making theories rather than a basis
for discovering things in themselves.
The theories that are discussed relate primarily to
preference/probability type rule sets rather than absolute boolean type
logics and as such are somewhat akin to the extended definition of
values used by Pirsig.
Ron am I close?
{Ron]
Jos you explained what I'm seeing, I'm at a point of snipping that paper
apart to explain relative
questions and how they apply. I'm no physicist either but after coming
at this from the awareness
of the limit of the round and what I do for a living, which is utilizing
raw data to create digital
Terrain models, I may have a easier time seeing the paralells than
others. but as you say everytime
I read over it, topos mimicks MOQ.
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
