[Platt] Thanks Ron. The key phrase IMO is "other synonyms for good." What is good and what is not good is what ethics is all about, right being good, wrong being not good. So the MOQ subordinates everything to Quality, i.e., the Good. And "everything" includes the inorganic as well as all the levels.
So I think my interpretation is still valid although if you think otherwise, please comment further. [Ron] I think it all swings on the interpretation. I think Pirsig describes it as "good" and "less good" rather than a "right or wrong" because "right and wrong" are easily misinterpreted. And are subjective for the most part within the culture which describes it. Accurate and inaccurate IMO comes closer to an "accurate " description of Pirsigs term given the context of the main Concept of the MOQ. I feel your interpetation is valid although the degree of accuracy may be challenged given Your specific understanding of the term "wrong". Thanks for the opportunity ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
