Ham, I have been following your threads w/Krimmel and I follow you and agree with your statements up until (maybe this is my misunderstanding) the negation of the essent, when summed up means because there is substance in the unverse its negate is nothingness a vacuume an absolute zero with the rational of since there is a one(1) there must be a zero(0) and that tension is what drives all.
The logical vehicle that brings us to this point and the logic employed to arrive at essent vs. nothingness conflicts. If infinity is infinte, how then may nothing (an absolute) exist to create tension? Is this not preconcieved logic operating at the most fundemental level? The final question is- are you not doubtful that the theory of an absolute is ultimately based on a preconception? I feel that once you hang your hat on any absolute, even if it is absolute zero(nothingness) You are hanging your hat on pre-conception and the finite. Thank you for you're time _Ron moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
