Craig, and it is obvious the cat went after a
bird.
woods,
SA
> [Micah]
> > It would be proper to say - "I think my cat sees a
> bird". The key being, "I think".
>
> 1) My cat sees a bird.
> 2) I think my cat sees a bird.
> 3) I believe my cat sees a bird.
> 4) I know my cat sees a bird.
>
> If I say any of 1) - 4), then (unless I'm lying) I
> think my cat sees a bird. So it's not the
> particular phrasing that is key.
> What's at issue is whether it is possible for my cat
> to see a bird & if so, is it possible for me to have
> (good) evidence that she does. My view is that it
> is possible for my cat to do (what I call) seeing &
> in particular, for her to see (what I call) a bird.
> My evidence is that she is very good at (what I
> call) stalking a bird & unfortunately occasionally
> (what I call) catching one. A cat that could not
> see would not have such (unfortunate) success. Of
> course, the phrase 'what I call' can be eliminated
> above, since it is obvious that it is me doing the
> calling.
> Craig
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Send moq_discuss mailing list submissions to
> > [email protected]
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
> Web, visit
> >
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of moq_discuss digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: David Hildebrand (David M)
> > 2. Re: Collective intelligence (David M)
> > 3. Re: Collective intelligence (Granger) (David M)
>
> > 4. Re: Social Darwinism (David M)
> > 5. Re: Collective intelligence (Granger) (Krimel)
> > 6. Re: Collective intelligence (David M)
> > 7. Re: (MD] Collective intelligence (David M)
> >
> >
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:32:33 +0100
> > From: "David M"
> > Subject: Re: [MD] David Hildebrand
> > To:
> > Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;
> charset="iso-8859-1";
> > reply-type=original
> >
> > Hi DMB
> >
> > RE: your essay:
> >
> > http://www.robertpirsig.org/Buchanan.htm
> >
> > I have recently been chatting with David
> Hildebrand who you mention in your
> > essay
> > on Rorty, he has confirmed he has read and enjoyed
> ZMM. Have you seen his
> > essay: < BR>>
> >
>
http://davidhildebrand.org/articles/hildebrand_putnam.pdf
>
> >
> > Take a look because I think he says some
> interesting things in
> > this about truth that differs from what you say in
> your essay
> > and where I think you are making similar errors to
> Putnam
> > (not bad company but I would side with Hildebrand
> over
> > Putnam on his approach to truth).
> >
> > Enjoy
> >
> > David M
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:54:10 +0100
> > From: "David M"
> > Subject: Re: [MD] Collective intelligence
> > To:
> > Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;
> charset="iso-8859-1";
> > reply-type=original
> >
> > Hi Craig
> >
> > great to see the spirit of scie nce and experiment
> is alive and well
> >
> > David M
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From:
> > To:
> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:00 AM
> > Subject: Re: [MD] Collective intelligence
> >
> >
> > > I've been holding my 2 female cats up to the
> mirror to see if they show
> > > any signs of self-recognition. One seems either
> uninterested or
> > > uncomfortable. The other is sometimes interested
> in looking at herself, at
> > > other times looks at me in the mirror. Similar
> results if I hold them
> > > both up together.
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > moq_discuss mailing list
> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > >
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>
> > > Archives:
> > >
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>
> > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_
> discuss_archive/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 22:46:09 +0100
> > From: "David M"
> > Subject: Re: [MD] Collective intelligence
> (Granger)
> > To:
> > Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;
> charset="iso-8859-1";
> > reply-type=original
> >
> > unless we can out smart them
> >
> > David M
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Krimel"
> > To:
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: [MD] Collective intelligence
> (Granger)
> >
> >
> > > [David M]
> > > So no government no protection for individuals
> from tyranny?
> > > Therefore no individuals only subjects withou t
> society/govn.
>
=== message truncated ===
____________________________________________________________________________________Looking
for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
