Here's a tiny skull question that might help me
understand all this betterness going on here.
For one, betterness is argued, that I can agree
with. But to say one level is better than another
level, that is where I'm having trouble. I say no,
one level can't be compared with another level in such
a way.
So, here's my question as follows:
When Pirsig asked the question, "What is
Quality?", is it the answer one focuses upon? Or, is
it the question that is not completely answered that
one focuses upon? I admit, I have focused on the
incompleteness. I've kept the question in place.
This is how I view Quality to be both static and
dynamic.
nightly breeze,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
