[Platt]
> I agree. Quality cannot be described in language. It
> cannot be broken down
> into subjects and predicates, not because it is
> mysterious, but because
> it is so simple, immediate and direct. This I
> learned from Paul Turner.
> So the question will go unanswered because Quality
> is fundamentally beyond
> words. Nevertheless, we know and understand it as
> the natural and immediate
> recognition of something good. Keep focusing on the
> question and the answer
> reveals itself.
Platt, not only is quality beyond words, but
quality has different levels. Thus, intellectual
level can't compared itself fully with social and
biological, etc... levels. The biological level can't
be compared fully with social and intellectual, etc...
levels. If biological would match any other level,
for example intellectual level, completely, in
definition (that is static definition), then the
intellectual level would not be the intellectual
level, it would be biological level. So, it is not a
matter of words can't fully express quality, but
social can't fully express intellectual and
biological, etc....
woods,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________Take
the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news,
photos & more.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
