Quoting Krimel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Platt,
> 
> It is really curious to see you flailing around with this kind of thing.
> Sometimes you speak of things evolving. You point out that Pirsig buys into
> a version of it and if Bob said it, it must be so. Then you obviously spent
> some time thinking about the matter.
> 
> So if you think the theory is full of holes. How do you account for it? Are
> you buying Johnson and Behe's divine intervention?

First, I'm not the only one who thinks Darwinian theory is full of holes. Many
smarter than me believe it leaves much to be desired. Second, I do not
believe evolution occurs through divine intervention. Third, I think Pirsig
is on to something with his natural force that pulls the universe as we know
it towards greater versatility and freedom. I consider this to be a "life force"
on a par with other types of physical energies. I buy the idea that this
force is represented to us as consciousness. 

Now how all this works to evolve new species and such I leave to the experts.
I notice in Wikipedia that there are various developments in evolutionary theory
such as symbiogenesis, evo-devo, neo-structuralism, eusociality, horizontal
gene transfer and who knows what else, suggesting to me that the theory is far
from settled or complete.

So if I'm "flailing around" I'm in good company. To put it in the postmodern
vernacular, "My mind is set on keeping an open mind."      

 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to