dmb said to DM: Oh, I see. You've been talking some kind of Platonic theism. No wonder I smelled bullshit. Seriously. This is unsupportable, unknowable, ridiculous stuff. Don't you think? Eternal objects that reside in the bossom of god? Puh leeez.
Krimel replied to dmb: Oh right, you can sum everything Whitehead had to say into two sentences. That makes him easy to dismiss. Given the title of the thread and your avowed love of Wilber I thought it was a given that you liked bullshit. That smell is probably coming from your upper lip. dmb says: Sum up everything Whitehead had to say? No, I was responding a one small snippet from Sneddon's paper. But what I really want to know is why you'd object to my objection. Are you saying that its not bullshit to assert the existence of eternal objects that reside in god? I thought I was supposed to be the gullable one? You can object to the idea of a broader empiricism in our science and yet you can swallow this nonsense? Say it ain't so. Gav's going all soft on me and now you too? I'd pray for help, but I don't believe in that. _________________________________________________________________ Like puzzles? Play free games & earn great prizes. Play Clink now. http://club.live.com/clink.aspx?icid=clink_hotmailtextlink2 moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
