At 05:17 PM 6/15/2007, you wrote: > > > [gav] > > > > >to clarify, 'god' is A CONCEPT. you can't > > believe > > > > or disbelieve it, it just is. you can interpret > > it, > > > > play with it, expand or ignore it but you can't > > make > > >it > > > > >disappear by not believing in it. this is just > > >plain absurd. > > > > > > [Marsha previously] > > > > Would you like to write about something that > > isn't a concept? > > > > God. Pebble. No difference. > > [SA previously] > > > What are you asking here? > > [Marsha] > > You may be having, or have had, direct experience of > > blue, wind and woods, but writing about them places >them in the > > category of concepts. What do you think? > > blue: inorganic level > wind: inorganic level > woods: now this includes all static levels plus >dynamic quality. This is what I mean by woods. > > the writing of blue, wind, and woods, the pure >writing, not the inorganic level blue for instance: >intellectual level > >crows cawing, >SA
SA Are you saying the _writing_ of blue, wind and woods is an experience at the intellectual level? SPoVs (concepts) being experienced (written) at the intellectual level? Marsha moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
