At 10:35 AM 6/16/2007, you wrote: > [SA previously] > > > blue: inorganic level > > > wind: inorganic level > > > woods: now this includes all static levels > > plus dynamic quality. This is what I mean by woods. > > > the writing of blue, wind, and woods, the >pure > > >writing, not the inorganic level blue for instance: >intellectual level > > [Marsha] > > Are you saying the _writing_ of blue, wind and woods > > is an experience at the intellectual level? > > Yes, blue, wind and woods - written, is an >experience at the intellectual level. > > [Marsha] > > SPoVs (concepts) being experienced (written) at the >intellectual level? > > Yes. > 'The biological level of birds flying as I watch >them' is the biological level on the intellectual >level. When I say this I'm emphasizing 'me watching'. > The wind blowing while I walk is the biological level >emerging on the intellectual level. Again, I'm >present, this human being with an intellect. Thus, >wind blowing, this inorganic level event, emerges on >the intellectual level as this wind is brought to my >attention.
Everything connected to everything? moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
