[Ian]
Imposing tyranny is your spin...

[Arlo]
Sure it is. Again, a spin that derives from reading Marx from the perspective
that "property = freedom". 

[Ian quoting Platt]
"... if it results in millions murdered?"

[Arlo]
As I said from the get-go, although Marx anticipated a violent struggle (the
same way the American Revolution was a violent struggle, those in power do not
yield it gladly), the trajectory from Marx to "millions murdered" had
everything to do with Lenin, who laid the groundwork by, like Strauss and the
neocons, believing that the people needed a strong Glorious State myth. By the
time Stalin took power, the adherence to this singular "manifest destiny" myth
was all that remained, and any real Marxist ideology was buried under the
weight of a state that promoted unyielding patriotism and state nationalism.

Interestingly, you could make the same case for ideology espoused by Jesus,
which became secondary (and in many cases hollow rhetoric) under the weight of
the Church, which in Jesus' name launched the Crusades, the Inquisition, the
extermination of the Americas indigenous populations, burnt people alive, used
torture and execution to fend of threats to its power from "infidels" and
"barbarians". 


moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to