My block has ten houses on each side of the street. Each household owns its
own lawn mower instead of sharing, even though rarely anyone mows at the same
time as anyone else. So instead of twenty $100 mowers ($2000 outlay), we
could get by with one $100 mower.
What's notable is (a) we could do so voluntarily, without force (much less
violent revolution) and (b) we could do so regardless of what other blocks do.
Which is freer: a society which allows advertising or one which prohibits it?
In the former you are free TO advertise, in the latter you are free FROM
advertising.
Which is freer: a society in which property can only be held in common or one
in which you can have private property, share property or do without property?
Craig
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
