[Platt]
To my U.S. friends: I don't know about you,  but it doesn't look to me  that
universal health care is the panacea for all our system's ills that  some make
it out to be.

[Arlo]
A news report released by a combined effort of several of the National
Academies in 2006 found that:

"Medication errors are among the most common medical errors, harming at least
1.5 million people every year, says a new report from the Institute of Medicine
of the National Academies.  The extra medical costs of treating drug-related
injuries occurring in hospitals alone conservatively amount to $3.5 billion a
year, and this estimate does not take into account lost wages and  productivity
or additional health care costs, the report says."

It continues...

"Medication errors encompass all mistakes involving prescription drugs,
over-the-counter products, vitamins, minerals, or herbal supplements.  Errors
are common at every stage, from prescription and administration of a drug to
monitoring of the patient's response, the committee found.  It estimated that
on average, there is at least one medication error per hospital patient per
day, although error rates vary widely across facilities.  Not all errors lead
to injury or death, but the number of preventable injuries that do occur -- the
committee estimated at least 1.5 million each year -- is sobering, the report
says.

Studies indicate that 400,000 preventable drug-related injuries occur each year
in hospitals.  Another 800,000 occur in long-term care settings, and roughly
530,000 occur just among Medicare recipients in outpatient clinics.  The
committee noted that these are likely underestimates."

The release report is available here (links to the report itself are available,
but it looks like it is not free):

http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11623

Its evident that both systems are fraught with the same difficulties, but the
underlying question remains, do we let the economic market determine who lives
and who dies? Do we let the poor die off and "decrease the surplus population"?
Or do we move towards a health care system that affords all our citizens access
to health care?

We may always have problems enacting any system, whether it be our current one
or theirs, but I'd rather err on the side that values human life above economic
wealth. 

Social darwinism? No, thanks. I prefer the valuation of human life, and the
increased freedoms afforded to all, by a healthcare system that treats each
person as a unique, valuable, worthy patient.

Having said this, I'm not participating in the same tired old "debate". 



moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to