[Platt]
> The criteria for nudity being biological for humans is its close association
> with the sexual act. If it turned out that it was intellectual, then yes, it
> would be
> wrong for society to prohibit it. On what basis would you determine that
> public
> nudity was intellectual?
One possibility is free expression. This raises a question about Pirsig's
levels. Suppose an individual's sexual fulfillment is biological & is being
surpressed by society (wearing burkas, genital mutilation, foot binding,
whatever.) Is it good for society to do this just because it's at a higher
level?
Craig
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
