Hi all,

Dear Louis,
I suggest you to perform a bootstrapped cluster
analysis on your data (try on Procrustes distances, or
on Rel. Warp scores). This type of cluster analysis
helps to identify statistically robust group
(=clusters); the main reference is Pillar, 1999, 2001
(Pillar, V.D., 1999. How sharp are classifications?
Ecology 80, 2508–2516; Pillar, V.D., 2001. MULTIV
2.1.1. Program, Porto Alegre.). You can check
significance of a given partition (i.e. four groups)
by means of resampling procedure. For a potential
useful application see: Raia, Piras, Kotsakis. 2006.
Detection of Plio-Quaternary large mammal communities
of Italy: integration to biochronology. Quatern. Sci.
Rev. London, 25: 846-854.
You can download the reference at this web site:
http://host.uniroma3.it/laboratori/paleontologia/Piras_vert.htm

Best
Paolo Piras, Ph.D.










 I would like to simply point that PCA knows nothing
> about groups. It
> merely provides a lower dimensional representation of
> higher dimensional
> data that maximizes representation of total variance.
> The appearance of
> groups separations along, say, PC1, often occurs, but
> is in no way
> designed into the method.
>
> If you have clusters, then MANOVA, preferably of the
> nonparametric
> variety, will tell you if there are significant
> differences between the
> predefined groups, and other methods like CVA will
> give an optimal
> low-dimensional representation of those group
> differences.
>
> Get thee to any decent multivariate text book, e.g.,
> Krazanowski's Principles of Multivariate Analysis or
> many others, and
> now might be a good time to start learning R
> (http://www.r-project.org).
>
> Are you using tps programs? If so, you can do the
> MANOVA with tpsREGRE -
> regress shape on g-1 dummy variables encoding groups.
> The excellent help
> file should have the instructions.
>
> Best, dslice
>
> morphmet wrote:
>> Dear morphometricians,
>>
>> I have the following problem:
>>
>> I have performed a PCA of shape (relative warps
>> analysis) on a set of
>> mouse mandibles from animals of different geographic
>> origins. Now in a
>> plot of PC1 vs PC2, I can "see" that PC1 sorts
>> specimens into broadly
>> overlapping clusters corresponding to the respective
>> origins of the
>> mice, while PC2 (and the other PCs) do not. The
>> problem is now that the
>> overlaps of the "population" clusters are rather
>> broad so the question
>> is how different they actually are. Also, I have
>> several "populations",
>> so it looks like a continuum of overlapping clouds.
>> Could you recommend a means to quantify and/or
>> somehow test the actual
>> differences between "populations" along PC1?
>>
>> Louis Boell
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Machen Sie Ihre E-Mail-Kontakte zu
>> Messenger-Freunden! Einfacher
>> Adressimport!
>> <http://redirect.gimas.net/?cat=hmtl&n=M1007AI&d=http://messenger.live.de/ersteschritte_adressimport.html>
>>
>
> --
> Dennis E. Slice
> Department of Anthropology
> University of Vienna
> ========================================================
>
>
>
> --
> Replies will be sent to the list.
> For more information visit
> http://www.morphometrics.org
>
>




-- 
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to