-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Cryptic in genetics
Date:   Thu, 22 May 2008 16:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Lindsay Eaves-Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:     [email protected]
References:     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Hi,

Um, I'm not a cryptic specialist, but I don't know any anthropologists
who buys the Schwartz orang argument...although, Eugene Dubois (of Java
Man fame) did think we were most closely related to the gibbon...  I did
remember an article (and associated one) that we read in our species
diversity seminar that seemed like a pretty thorough overview. See
citation below and those within the articles:

L E-J
*
*Bickford, D., Lohman, D.J., Sodhi, N.S., Ng,P.K.L., Meier, R., Winker,
K., Ingram, K.K., and Das, I. 2007. Cryptic species as a window on
diversity and conservation. /Trends in Ecology & Evolution/ 22:148-155.*

Pfenninger, M., and Schwenk, K. 2007. Cryptic animal species are
homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. /BMC
Evolutionary Biology /7:121/./

*

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:20 PM, morphmet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:



    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: Re: Cryptic in genetics
    Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 13:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
    From: andrea cardini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
    To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    Dear Pablo,
    maybe you can give a look at the paper below to see whether there's
    anything interesting for you:

    Cardini A, Thorington Jr. R. W., P. D. Polly, 2007 - Evolutionary
    acceleration in the most endangered mammal of Canada: phylogenetic
    signal
    and cranial divergence in the Vancouver Island marmot (Rodentia,
    Sciuridae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20: 1833-1846.

    "Beside the implications for the study of models of
    population divergence and speciation, the story of the
    Vancouver Island marmot can be read also from a rather
    different perspective. Species with a large phenotypic
    divergence but small genetic differentiation (measured
    using a common genetic marker like the mitochondrial
    cytochrome b) can be seen as the 'other side of coin' of
    the cryptic species concept"

    I am sure there's more in the literature but possibly it has not
    been said
    explicitly.
    Cheers

    Andrea


    At 15:59 21/05/2008 -0400, you wrote:



        -------- Original Message --------
        Subject: Cryptic in genetics
        Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:41:45 -0400
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: morphmet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
        References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>

        Dear colleagues,

        Besides the problem behind species concepts and aesthetic
        (non-scientific) values for particular kinds of phylogenetic and
        taxonomic characters, I am currently searching for published
        examples
        where the species is cryptic from the genetic perspective but
        recognizable (different) from the morphological perspective.
        This is a
        counter-current example which is apparently very difficult to find.

        An interesting example is the evidence presented by Jeffrey
        Schwartz on
        his book: "The Red Ape: Orangutans and Human Origins" where he
        contests
current genetic evidence upon the common origin shared by chimps and
        humans, arguing instead for the orangutan.

        I will appreciate any published studies suggesting morphological
        evidence for species lineage independence (i.e. species) opposing
        genetic evidence of single lineages (genetically cryptic).

        Thanks

        Pablo

        Pablo Jarrin
        Ph. D. candidate
        Dept. of Biology / Boston University
        M. A. Ecology Behavior and Evolution
        Boston Univ.
        Director
        Yasuni Research Station
        Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas
        Pont. Univ. Católica del Ecuador.







        --
        Replies will be sent to the list.
        For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org




    Dr. Andrea Cardini

    Lecturer in Animal Biology
    Museo di Paleobiologia e dell'Orto Botanico, Universitá di Modena e
    Reggio
    Emilia
    via Università 4, 41100, Modena, Italy
    tel: 0039 059 2056532; fax: 0039 059 2056535

    Honorary Fellow
    Functional Morphology and Evolution Unit, Hull York Medical School
    University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
    University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK

    E-mail address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    http://hyms.fme.googlepages.com/drandreacardini

http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/archive/cerco_lt_2007/overview.cfm#metadata








    --
    Replies will be sent to the list.
    For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org




--
K. Lindsay Eaves-Johnson, MA
PhD Candidate
University of Iowa
Department of Anthropology
114 Macbride Hall
Iowa City, Iowa 52242

"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would
it?" — Albert Einstein

--
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to