Dear morpho community, I have a philosophical question on size correction that should start an interesting discussion. When we are interested in seeing the effects of species or environmental variables for example, on shape, people often first remove allometric variation by computing the residuals of a shape ` size regression. This of course, doesn't make sense if there are heterogeneous slopes and species have different allometric trajectories (i.e. if the species*size term is significant). What do you think would be the most appropriate way to deal with this situation then, if you are interested in environmental effects on shape? Best regards, Damien Esquerré
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Morphmet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/morphmet2/CAJiv7Cw0S2A%3D-kpEmknt-tUp92Vjy0hkiF%3DVF6C77NsFECP%2BMw%40mail.gmail.com.
