Dear Pablo,

        The use of discriminant functions in taxonomy reminds me... one
of my papers. I used traditional morphometric measurements and a
discriminant function to separate two species of minute beetles from
Guinea. The reference is:

Bameul F. 2003. Psalitrus aberlenci n. sp., nouvel Omicrini de GuinÃe
(Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). Bulletin de la SociÃtà entomologique de
France, 108 (4): 371-376.

if you need a reprint, please ask (however, it is in French).

        An interesting classical paper often cited on this subject is :

Lubischew A.A. 1962. On the use of discriminant functions in taxonomy.
Biometrics, 18: 455-477.

        The use of discriminant functions to separate species is well
illustrated in :

Desender K. & De Dijn B. 1990. The Calosoma species (Coleoptera,
Carabidae) of the Galapagos archipelago. II. Discriminant analyses and
species identification key. Bulletin de l'Institut royal des Sciences
naturelles de Belgique, 60: 55-68.

        Ichtyologists have used extensively discriminant functions in
taxonomy and there are a lot of valuable studies using this method for
fish identification, e.g.:

Misra R.K. & Ni I.-H. 1983. Distinguishing Beaked Redfishes (Deepwater
Redfish, Sebastes mentella and Labrador Redfish, S. fasciatus) by
Discriminant Analysis (with Covariance) and Multivariate Analysis of
Covariance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 40:
1507-1511.

        Bryan Manly's book has clear explanations about the use of
discriminant functions in taxonomy :

Manly B.F.J. 2005. Multivariate Statistical Methods. A primer.Boca Raton
: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 214 p.

        I hope this help.               Franck


------------------------------
Dr Franck BAMEUL

Le Clos d'Ornon
7, rue FrÃdÃric Mistral
F-33140 VILLENAVE D'ORNON
France

e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------
-- 
Replies will be sent to the list.
For more information visit http://www.morphometrics.org

Reply via email to