Just as a quick follow up (and clarifications). I recognize that there are already a number of methods to deal with these well known issues (McCoy et al. 2006, Klingenberg 1996, Burnaby 1966, etc..) and they may be better ways still. However, since the "using residuals from a pooled within-group regression" remains so common, I thought the broader conversation may be useful.
Also I did not mean that everyone will always observe very high vector correlations for the allometric slope of shape on sex (across sexes) or small partial R^2. I was trying to make a bit of a caricature of an example to make my point. Sorry for any confusion. Cheers, Ian dwor...@mcmaster.ca -- MORPHMET may be accessed via its webpage at http://www.morphometrics.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MORPHMET" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to morphmet+unsubscr...@morphometrics.org.
