On Jun 22, 2007, at 5:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>     As a fan of audio books I can say that the reader  can make all the
> difference. I would say to those who would like examples of how  to 
> read a loud and
> how not to, listen to an audio book of Harry Potter  or Lord of the 
> Rings and
> then listen to Dan Brown's Angels and  Demons.

I agree with Nancy here.

I really dislike audiobooks because I'm not an auditory processor, but 
my SO loves them so I've "sort of" listened to a lot of them (actually 
I daydream and have a full imaginary life in my brain, so long trips 
are interesting) and the very, very best are the Harry Potter ones 
because they are narrated by Jim Dale, who is a wonder. He also does a 
magnificent narration of Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" and recently we 
listened to James Patterson's "Violets Are Blue" which I was actually 
able to follow because the narrator/reader sounded EXACTLY like Morgan 
Freeman, who plays Alex Cross in the movie series.

The narrator makes all the difference.

On another note about this thread, I can't say I totally agree, only 
because who is to decide what it means to be "good at" reading a book 
aloud? At what point does "bad at" become "good at"?

Renée


When you have only two pennies left in the world, buy a loaf of bread 
with one, and a lily with the other.
~ Chinese Proverb



_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to