I've held off putting in my two cents worth, but I just felt I had to jump in 
after reading some of the posts about prompts on retelling.
 
Why is there such a negative connotation regarding a prompt?  Think about 
it....when you read a book you really really like and you are so excited to 
tell someone about it, do you remember every single detail?  And in having that 
conversation with the person you are sharing about the book, what happens when 
they ask you a question about the book, you answer it and sometimes it spurs 
more of your memory of why you liked the booked so much.  Why spend time 
teaching kids about a rubric...spend time teaching them what is important and 
what the big idea of the book is.
 
I'll start right off by saying that is one of the reasons I am not a fan of 
DRA.  When retelling a story, the student is penalized if prompted.  Many of 
our students are conditioned from their home environment/culture not to respond 
unless asked.  Plus, what are we assessing:  comprehension or memory?  They 
read the book one time and are asked to retell every detail.  
 
I also wonder why we expect every detail when retelling?  I want my kids to 
tell me about characters, setting, etc, but as an example, if they tell me "all 
the animals" went into the mitten to get warm (in the book The Mitten) is it 
wrong as long as they can tell me how it ended?  I've had kids tell the BIG 
IDEA of books, yet, didn't tell me every single detail that the DRA required.  
Technically, they failed the DRA, yet I think they had a deeper understanding 
of the book than what they DRA assessed.
 
I would like to suggest two alternatives to DRA:
 
1.  Assessment to Instruction:  This is set up by genre and begins with the 
essential understanding of what the children need to learn in retelling.  In 
addition to the books and the assessments, scaffold instruction is laid out 
from the youngest reader to the more sophisticated. Anchor charts, forms, 
assts. its all there. It comes with a DVD with teachers in conferences or 
assts. with children.  I'm not doing justice to ATI so I suggest you write to:
    
Dr. Janine Batzle    
A Place for the Child 
16625 Redmond Way, Ste. M533
Redmond, WA  98052
888-487-5924
425-882-6942
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Many of you may recognize her name as a respected member of this list serve as 
well as the literacy community.  I have used and continue to use her material 
in my teaching today.  
 
2.  Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Asst. System:  This just came out in July and 
in addition to helping you teach for deep comprehension it assesses for deep 
comprehension.  You are certainly NOT penalized for prompts.  I absolutely love 
how it lays out how to teach for comprehension in the book, about the book and 
thinking about book.  It comes not only with the books and asst. but a CD with 
professional dev.; data forms, and blackline masters;  The reading continuum is 
an absolute BIBLE for teaching for deep comprehension.  I have been amazed at 
how much I have learned just from using it these last few months and look 
forward to delving deeper in it as I learn.  F&P has a book that came out about 
2 years ago called Fluency and Comprehension;  I found it overwhelming when I 
first saw it and let it.  Now that I have the asst kit, the book has opened a 
whole new world to me in understanding how I need to teach for deep 
comprehension.  It's certainly not
 overwhelming now and is clarifying so much for me.  The asst. kit comes in to 
two sets:  A-N and L-Z.  Go on line and take a look.  My entire district has 
adopted this for our K-2 asst. system.
 
Respectfully,
 
Sandi Stringham
1-2 multiage
Elgin, IL
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to