Is there an argument between shorter text and longer text? Shouldn't  
readers..... ALL readers... have some of each?

Renee

On Sep 6, 2008, at 7:58 AM, Lyndsay Buehler wrote:

> I've just been reading Lucy Calkins' "The Art of Teaching Reading,"
> and I've been reminded that shorter texts have greater social
> currency.  They're accessible to a greater number of readers and can
> be passed around the classroom in a shorter period of time (i.e. when
> one classmate recommends it to another, in terms of choosing books
> from the classroom library).
>
> --  
> Lyndsay Buehler
> Grade 1 Literacy / Grades 1-6 Music, Ontario
>
> "There is no end to learning." -- Robert Schumann
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Laura Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
> wrote:
>> Why don't you make your own tests for those books and put it in  your  
>> AR
>> system?   I have done that for quite a few books that weren't AR  
>> books, or
>> we hadn't purchased the tests.  Your students could even help in  
>> creating
>> some of the tests.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William  
>> Roberts
>> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:27 PM
>> To: 'Mosaic: A Reading Comprehension Strategies Email Group'
>> Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] text length
>>
>> Believe me when I say I understand completely how you feel.
>>
>> The problem is if one strategy works, then the powers that be decree  
>> that
>> ALL must do it.  I have kids who are fluent readers well above the  
>> 150-170
>> wpm of their age group, but we have to do daily fluency practice  
>> regardless.
>> I understand what you are going through.  I've had to revise college  
>> level
>> samples for them in order to challenge them during the fluency  
>> practice.
>> I've gone to my principal and have shown her the data proving my  
>> students
>> are all fluent, but as a school, we didn't show growth in fluency  
>> last year,
>> so she is insisting that everyone will do fluency.
>>
>> I like AR for students who don't read much, but when you have students
>> reading Vonnegut, Grisham, King, and THE HITCHIKER'S GUIDE TO THE  
>> GALAXY,
>> those aren't all AR books.  Do I force AR on my students?  No, but we  
>> are
>> required to read AR books daily for 20 minutes SSR.  I'd rather a  
>> student
>> read a non AR selection that challenges them, than a boring series  
>> book
>> written for children, but when they are required to have an AR book  
>> with
>> them daily....I just tell them to have 2 books with them.
>>
>> In fact, I teach my kids 2 types of reading:  SCHOOL and REAL WORLD.   
>> In
>> school, we read nonsense and stuff that has little or no meaning in  
>> our
>> lives at the present moment.  In real life, we read what we enjoy,  
>> what we
>> are interested in, and what has meaning in our lives.  Many times I  
>> have had
>> to make the distinction when teaching a strategy or lesson....
>>
>> But as far as short texts go, there are many that lend themselves to  
>> deep
>> discussion and debate.  Opinion pieces, poetry by Langston Hughes or  
>> Robert
>> Frost, speeches, short stories like "The Lottery" and "The Monkey's  
>> Paw" can
>> all bring out the kind of teaching you described.  I agree that  
>> larger works
>> can enhance a reader's strengths, but don't discount the short texts.  
>>  I
>> like exposing them to more works and authors to enhance their  
>> backgrounds.
>> I an just concerned that a longer work may turn off a reader who has  
>> to wait
>> for the book to be finished, while shorter works may keep them  
>> interested
>> with the variety of choices.
>>
>> I know there is some support for it, but I don't remember where I saw  
>> it.  I
>> tend to discount most research anyway since Reading First has been  
>> found at
>> fault.  I think sometimes we spend so much time worried about whether  
>> a
>> teaching strategy has research or documentation, we tend to forget  
>> what's
>> happening in our classrooms.  A program or strategy is only as good  
>> as the
>> teacher teaching it.  A great researched program given to a bad  
>> teacher is
>> not going to work as well as a good teacher teaching by the seat of  
>> his or
>> her pants...
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mosaic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/ 
>> mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
>>
>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mosaic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/ 
>> mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
>>
>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/ 
> mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.
>
>
"The Buddha, the Godhead, resides quite as comfortably in the circuits  
of a digital computer or the gears of a cycle transmission as he does  
at the top of the mountain, or in the petals of a flower."
~ Robert Pirsig ~ Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to