Our district is using the DIBELS assessment - fast, easy screening tool. We use 
it on Palm pilots so the only paper used is the student copy. The test is 
completely scored on the Palm. It makes it very easy to administer and you have 
instant results - high risk, some risk, low risk, progress graphs, etc. There 
are benchmark materials so progress goals are set for each individual; the 
students, teachers and parents can clearly see if the student is progressing 
appropriately or not. It is for k-6 and has been a great tool used by all the 
teachers for planning instruction, targeting needs, and conferences with 
parents. It is a screening tool, not a diagnostic assessment.


On Friday, September 11, 2009 9:20 AM, Mark & Rachele' Thummel 
<[email protected]> wrote:
I work in a fairly small district where we are looking into purchasing a 
K-12 reading assessment (not a reading program).  We are wanting a program 
that focuses on word recognition, fluency and reading comprehension (other 
reading elements are fine too).  Additionally, it needs to be something we 
can administer fairly quickly.  We do have some money to spend on this, but 
cannot spend tons.  I know there are a lot of assessments out there, but I 
need recommendations of those that have worked in existing districts.

I went through the archives and was not able to see any strands on this 
topic . . . but if someone knows of a strand to read, please let me know so 
we don't re-discuss this . . . Thanks! 


_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.





_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive.

Reply via email to