PS  Your "soapbox" regularly informs all of us.  Keep "soaping"!


On 7/17/11 10:31 AM, "Renee" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sally,
> 
> When I was teaching art, students came to me for one hour
> approximately once every three weeks or so. I wish, wish, wish I
> could have had them more often. With a few exceptions, most teachers
> just brought the students to me, dropped them off, and returned in an
> hour to pick them up. For the most part this worked fine for me
> because *some* of the teachers who stayed would sometimes interject
> their own strategies and thoughts and opinions and directions into my
> lesson, which drove me nuts. But overall, I really wish that the
> teachers had stayed to listen to the introductions, participate in
> the activities themselves, listened more closely to the questions I
> asked during discussions, and gave more thought to what was actually
> happening in my classroom, because there was tons of problem-solving,
> small motor development, eye-hand coordination, development of
> observation skills, juxtapositioning of overall composition and
> internal details, talking about great art works (you'd be surprised
> what a 1st grader can find in and extrapolate from closely observing
> the Mona Lisa!), writing about their art work, critiquing other's art
> work, comparing student works, etc etc etc. There is a ton of
> language arts and math work in there. Tons.
> 
> Off my soapbox now....
> Renee
> 
> 
> On Jul 17, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Sally Thomas wrote:
> 
>> You have me thinking as I am going to bring the two emails to my
>> class on
>> Thursday for discussion.
>> 
>> Maybe there should be a "push in" with knowledgeable support teachers
>> co-planning with the regular teacher to help create better reading
>> workshop
>> type classrooms.  And two informed teachers have to be better than
>> one in
>> terms of giving differentiated support to children????
>> 
>> Sally
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/17/11 7:54 AM, "Renee" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Oh my..... I SOOOOO disagree with this!  No child should be excluded
>>> from equal access to the curriculum, and that includes Art, Music,
>>> P.E., or whatever else, no matter where they are performing. In
>>> fact, I
>>> would say that low-performing children might need these parts of
>>> curriculum most of all.... to help them see and experience the grand
>>> intertwining of all parts of learning. Children who are
>>> "underperforming" according to some standardized assessment shouldn't
>>> be punished and have their curriculum narrowed down. Children don't
>>> need *more* reading instruction, they need *better* reading
>>> instruction
>>> (and in my opinion, that means more actual reading and less actual
>>> drilling).
>>> 
>>> I understand too well the frustration of having students pulled
>>> out of
>>> class for small group instruction and in fact I am not particularly
>>> supportive of trading students around among teachers that people
>>> do so
>>> much of these days. But narrow the curriculum because a child is
>>> reading below grade level? Sorry..... can't support that one.
>>> 
>>> Some food for thought:
>>> 
>>> 10 Lessons the Arts Teach
>>> 
>>> 1. The arts teach children to make good judgments about qualitative
>>> relationships.
>>> Unlike much of the curriculum in which correct answers and rules
>>> prevail, in the arts, it
>>> is judgment rather than rules that prevail.
>>> 2. The arts teach children that problems can have more than one
>>> solution
>>> and that questions can have more than one answer.
>>> 3. The arts celebrate multiple perspectives.
>>> One of their large lessons is that there are many ways to see and
>>> interpret the world.
>>> 4. The arts teach children that in complex forms of problem solving
>>> purposes are seldom fixed, but change with circumstance and
>>> opportunity. Learning in the arts requires the ability and a
>>> willingness to surrender to the unanticipated possibilities of the
>>> work
>>> as it unfolds.
>>> 5. The arts make vivid the fact that neither words in their literal
>>> form nor numbers exhaust what we can know. The limits of our language
>>> do not define the limits of our cognition.
>>> 6. The arts teach students that small differences can have large
>>> effects.
>>> The arts traffic in subtleties.
>>> 7. The arts teach students to think through and within a material.
>>> All art forms employ some means through which images become real.
>>> 8. The arts help children learn to say what cannot be said.
>>> When children are invited to disclose what a work of art helps them
>>> feel, they must reach into their poetic capacities to find the words
>>> that will do the job.
>>> 9. The arts enable us to have experience we can have from no other
>>> source
>>> and through such experience to discover the range and variety of what
>>> we are capable of feeling.
>>> 10. The arts' position in the school curriculum symbolizes to the
>>> young
>>> what adults believe is important.
>>> 
>>> SOURCE: Eisner, E. (2002). The Arts and the Creation of Mind, In
>>> Chapter 4, What the Arts Teach and How It Shows. (pp. 70-92). Yale
>>> University Press. Available from NAEA Publications. NAEA grants
>>> reprint
>>> permission for this excerpt from Ten Lessons with proper
>>> acknowledgment
>>> of its source and NAEA.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Renee
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 16, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Amy Lesemann wrote:
>>> 
>>>> We had arguments about this, and I lost until a new teacher came
>>>> in and
>>>> supported me. Frankly, if a student is 2 or more years- even less,
>>>> frankly -
>>>> then they really do need to sacrifice music, or art, or another
>>>> special for
>>>> extra reading instruction, and stay in the regular class for regular
>>>> reading
>>>> instruction. Before I got that extra vote in the faculty
>>>> meetings, the
>>>> remedial kids were getting pulled out of their regular classes to
>>>> meet
>>>> with
>>>> me...so they were getting exactly the same amount of instruction as
>>>> everyone
>>>> else. That's not the idea. They should be participating in
>>>> reading and
>>>> writing workshop, and then going to the specialist to target
>>>> their weak
>>>> areas - in phonics, using context clues, and so on.
>>>> 
>>>> Good luck!
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Amy Lesemann, Reading Specialist and Director, Independent Learning
>>>> Center
>>>> St. Thomas the Apostle Elementary School
>>> 
>>> 
>>> " What was once educationally significant, but difficult to measure,
>>> has been replaced by what is insignificant and easy to measure. So
>>> now
>>> we test how well we have taught what we do not value."
>>> ‹ Art Costa, emeritus professor, California State University
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mosaic mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/
>>> mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>>> 
>>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mosaic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
>> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/
>> mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>> 
>> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>> 
> 
> "The conductor of an orchestra doesn't make a sound... He depends for
> his power on his ability to make other people powerful."
> ~ Benjamin Zander
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
> 
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
> 



_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive

Reply via email to