Mena - can you cite your student's sources? Was her/his research on 
kindergarten or per-kindergarten programs? 

Thanks. 
Cathy

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 15, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Mena <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have to quote one of my students who researched this topic: 
> "Controversyexists in early childhood education with the development and 
> implementation ofskills-based standards and the necessary accompanying 
> standardized tests. State and national early childhood standards were 
> developed as a result of NoChild Left Behind, and more recently Race to the 
> Top, both federal initiatives. The controversy lies in the incongruity 
> between research-based developmentalpractices that have long been accepted 
> for early childhood and the academicskills standards that are construed by 
> many early childhood educators to bereplacing those.  Further controversy 
> erupts due to an increase instandardized testing of young children for 
> program accountability. Critics argue that such testing has very low 
> reliability, causes stressfor both children and teachers, causes major 
> curriculum changes, and results inlarge amounts of teacher-directed 
> instruction taking the place of moredevelopmentally appropriate activities 
> that are typical in play-based,child-centered preschools.  Traditional 
> child-initiated instruction inpreschool programs is thought to aid children 
> in their social and emotionalgrowth, development that will be lacking as more 
> teacher-directed curriculum isimposed on early childhood in an attempt to 
> teach skills that are not, in manycases, age appropriate.  The tendency 
> toward standardized teaching andassessment practices for young children is 
> not only an emotional issue, but atthe very core of determining how children 
> in the United States will best learnin order to be competent adults in our 
> global society.  This literaturereview investigates this multi-faceted 
> problem which involves young children,their parents, their teachers, as well 
> as government agencies and educationaltheorists.  "
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Philomena Marinaccio-Eckel, Ph.D.
> Florida Atlantic University  
> Dept. of Teaching and Learning    
> College of Education                    
> 2912 College Ave. ES 214
> Davie, FL  33314
> Phone:  954-236-1070
> Fax:  954-236-1050
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mlredcon <[email protected]>
> To: mosaic <[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri, Sep 14, 2012 7:44 pm
> Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Rigor of Common Core in Kindergarten
> 
> 
> The best way is to do on demand informal assessments using running records  
> so kids can move up when they are ready  and lots of interactive read aloud 
> for high level comprehension.  Take a look at the  
> website-readingwritingproject.com
> Maxine
> 
> 
> In a message dated 9/14/2012 3:56:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> [email protected] writes:
> 
> Hi! In  Iowa, we are busy aligning to Iowa Core in Kindergarten - a close
> spin off  Common Core.  We are experiencing some tripedation as we look
> to the  rigor of getting students to an  F & P level D by the end  of
> Kindergarten.  I am a reading specialist that wants to support the  Core,
> but more importantly, help my teachers get comfortable and do the  right
> thing at the right time in the most developmentaly appropriate  way.  I

_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive

Reply via email to