Hi, the features that typically get better performance with Moses are the lexicalized reordering and the support for higher order language models (I think). With the same features, performance should be very similar.
-phi On 11/12/07, Hieu Hoang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 5 BLEU points !? i wish. > > there are small differences between moses & pharaoh which usually makes > moses slightly better (less than 0.5 BLEU) for traditional phrase based > decoder. i recent paper @ IWSLT compared the difference between the 2 > systems > > http://www.cs.ust.hk/~dekai/library/WU_Dekai/ShenLoCarpuatWu_IWSLT2007.p > df > u can get better results by adding linguistic information, which is the > reason for moses > > > Hieu Hoang > www.hoang.co.uk/hieu > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of corporalist > corporalist > Sent: 12 November 2007 08:58 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Moses-support] About the comparison between Pharaoh and Moses. > > > Hi, guys, > > > Anyone have ever done some comparison between Pharaoh and Moses > in open data set? > > I wonder how much difference is reasonable. > > I have tried a comparison experiment on NIST05 Chinese-English > test using FBIS. > > My results showed that Moses can outperform Pharaoh by 5 Bleu > score. > > Is this difference reasonable? > > Anyone did similar comaparison pls kindly tell me your results. > > -fei > > _______________________________________________ > Moses-support mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support > > _______________________________________________ Moses-support mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/moses-support
